Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Athey v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2000No. 99-134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals held that the commission did not abuse its discretion in finding that Athey had constructively elected against receiving IEC compensation. We agree.

Former R.C. 4123.57(A) authorized the payment of IEC compensation, while former division (B) of the statute authorized the payment of PPD compensation. R.C. 4123.57 also required claimants to elect between division (A) compensation and division (B) compensation.1 Athey argues that she did not make this election until April 9, 1996 when she sent a letter and IC-90 notice of partial disability election form to Elby’s. Elby’s and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson Tube Serv., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Athey v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Block v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Block v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API