Legal Opinion

People v. Goree

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1971No. Docket 7876PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtE. B. Burns, J.

Defendants Goree and Holden were convicted by a jury of first-degree murder. MCLA § 750.316 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.548).

Immediately prior to their trial the circuit judge held a Walker hearing to determine the admissibility of several prearraignment and postarraignment statements. The postarraignment statements were ruled inadmissible. The trial judge deferred ruling on admissibility of the prearraignment statements and actually never made a ruling. The prearraignment statements were not introduced during the prosecutor’s case in chief. It was not until cross-examination of both defendants…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. GillisMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Collier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. State v. MiraultSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. People v. GimottyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API