Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Rudolph
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1999No. 97-2053PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Charles Rudolph filed a motion to vacate one of three counts of his conviction. When the district court resentenced Rudolph, it applied a sentence enhancement and it denied his request for a downward departure for his alleged post-sentence rehabilitation. Rudolph appeals, contending that the district court erred by holding that it lacked the discretion to consider his request for the departure, and that the district court committed constitutional error by resentencing him after vacating one of the counts of conviction. We reverse to the extent that the district…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Carl Jennings (95-3317) John Stepp (95-3318)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Albert Sally, A/K/A "Pj" Albert SallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Michael A. WhrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Brett L. Henderson (98-4087), David Nelms (98-4369)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jeffrey WorleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. LightfootCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Bobby Howard CookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.