Walker v. State

Appellant urges that the language used by the prosecuting attorney was objectionable as conveying to the jury the opinion that both said attorney and the sheriff believed appellant to be guilty. There is nothing in the record to indicate that either of said officers had any knowledge of the case save as gathered from the evidence.

In Marinkovich v. State, 96 Tex.Crim. R., 255 S.W. 734, we quoted with approval from Young v. State, 19 Tex. App. 536[19 Tex. Crim. 536], as follows: " 'While it is true that authors in treating upon this subject say that counsel either for or against the prisoner…