Yost v. Susquehanna Pipe Line Co.

Opinion by

Ehodes, J.,

As this workmen’s compensation case must be returned to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for further hearing and determination, an extended analysis of the evidence, and,a lengthy restatement of well-established legal principles would be of no purpose.

Claimant’s deceased husband was employed by defendant as a pipe line walker. On (March 6, 1934, he injured the large toe of his right foot by falling while performing his duties. The toe became inflamed and sore that evening. Thereafter he was admitted to a hospital for treatment. Following an operation he died on April 6,…