Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Hale

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1876PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Warren county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Soholeield

This was an action on the case, brought by appellee against appellant, in the court below, to recover for injuries to a jack, which appellant undertook to carry for appellee from Burlington, Iowa, to Monmouth, in this State.

The declaration contains two counts. In the first it is merely charged, after alleging the undertaking to carry, etc., that through the negligence of appellant and its servants, while the jack was being carried from Burlington to Monmouth by appellant, as a common carrier for hire, he was wholly lost to appellee, whereby he was damaged $1000.

The second count is, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. Cobb, Christy & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Priestly v. Northern Indiana & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Willis v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Geo. W. Robinson & Co. v. Hyer Bros.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. North Chicago Street Railroad v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Freeman v. DempseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API