Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Kaiser

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 14, 2003No. 02-0609/AR; Crim.App. ARMY 9900485PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Pursuant to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of violating a *147lawful order and two specifications of adultery in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 934 (2002). Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted Appellant of an additional specification of violating a lawful order and an additional specification of adultery. The adjudged and approved sentence provided for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. WolfordCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  5. United States v. DearingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API