Legal Opinion

Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 31, 2019No. 18-2140PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARTHREX, INC., Appellant v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., ARTHROCARE CORP., Appellees UNITED STATES, Intervenor ______________________ 2018-2140 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00275. ______________________ Decided: October 31, 2019 ______________________ ANTHONY P. CHO, Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, PC, Bir- mingham, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID LOUIS ATALLAH, DAVID J. GASKEY, JESSICAE ZILBERBERG. CHARLES T.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Arthrex, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Harry Calcutt III v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  3. Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  4. Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. Schiedmayer Celesta GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  5. McIntosh v. DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API