Legal Opinion

Musgrove v. Perkins

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Einth Judicial District, County of Shasta. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Field J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.

Vfhen this cause was called for trial, the counsel of the plaintiffs moved for a continuance, upon his affidavit that he had advised his clients not to prepare for the trial until an appeal from an order dissolving the injunction in the cause had been heard and determined by the Supreme Court; that, acting upon such advice, the necessary preparations had not been made, and could not then be made, in consequence of the absence of a material witness, whose presence or deposition would have been otherwise obtained. The Court…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. LandwehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pilot Rock Creek Canal Co. v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Harrison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Derkmann v. Von BlumenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Thornton v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API