Legal Opinion

State v. Stooksberry

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

This case presents for review the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming a conviction of issuing a worthless check in violation of Section 39-14-121 of the Tennessee Code Annotated. The record does not support the conviction.

On April 13, 1990, J.L. Dye sold some cattle to the defendant Stooksberry for $41,-600, and received from Stooksberry a check *907dated April 15, 1990, directing Community Bank and Trust to pay to Dye’s order the sum of $41,600. The check was deposited to Dye’s bank account at Lawrenceburg Federal Savings and Loan on the date received.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KelinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth v. MassaroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Cook v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Stines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  5. Esecson v. BushnellColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. AdcoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Tuan Ngoc Nguyen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. Mickey HarrisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. Donald Keith Solomon v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  5. State of Tennessee v. Bart Leo TuckerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API