Legal Opinion

Santoro v. Mirshel

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. A. Johnson, J.

This is an application by one Dominico Santoro for an order directing the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Hempstead to issue to the applicant a restaurant. *667license heretofore denied him by the Mayor and Village Board.

Petitioner alleges that for some ten years he has operated a restaurant in the village of Hempstead under a license issued by the Board of Trustees, that he owns the business and the building wherein it is conducted and has invested substantial sums therein; that late in December, 1944, the petitioner was advised that the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Linkus v. Maryland State Board of Heating Ventilation, Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration ContractorsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Santoro v. MirschelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Dubato v. Board of TrusteesNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API