Legal Opinion

David v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1984No. A14-83-112-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

Michael Ray David was found guilty of sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the application of the statute permitting court reporters to destroy their notes after three years deprived appellant of his rights to due process, equal protection and the effective assistance of counsel. We find, however, that appellant waived any alleged defects in the original plea proceedings. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The trial record indicates that appellant was indicted in December, 1978. The trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Pierce v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
  5. Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. David v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Charles R. Branch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Charles R. Branch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  5. David v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API