Legal Opinion
BASF Wyandotte Corp. v. Costle
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 25, 1978No. Nos. 77-1042, 77-1059, 77-1081, 77-1085 and 77-1153PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
We have before us a motion to amend petitions for review. Essentially, the disposition of this motion will determine initially1 whether we or the Fifth Circuit are mandated as the forum to conduct the review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s final regulations setting effluent limitation guidelines for the pesticides industry.
In order to address the statute and case law which control the outcome of this motion, it is necessary to set out the events leading up to the present motion. On November 1, 1976, E.P.A. promulgated its interim regulations in this area, 41…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., and National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. TrainDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- The American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Public Service Commission for the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Mobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Gulf Oil Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Sohio Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, the California Company, Intervenor. Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the California Company, Intervenor. Blanco Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, Continental Oil Company, Intervenors. Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the California Company, Intervenor. The Superior Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the California Company, Cities Service Oil Company, Intervenors. The California Company, a Division of Chevron Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Amoco Production Company v. Federal Power Commission, Amerada Hess Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Phillips Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- BASF Wyandotte Corp. v. CostleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Laketon Asphalt Refining, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior and Cecil Andrus, Secretary of the United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Basf Wyandotte Corp. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Monsanto Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Dow Chemical Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Monsanto Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Dow Chemical Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Eli Lilly and Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, National Agricultural Chemicals Association, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Virginia Electric And Power Company v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.