Legal Opinion

United States v. Alabama

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided February 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2:12cv179-MHTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

In this lawsuit, plaintiff United States of America named as defendants the State of Alabama and its Secretary of State and asserted claims based on the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act of 1986 (“UOCAVA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff. The United States sought to enforce the right of military members, their families, and other United States citizens living overseas (“UOCAVA voters”) to vote by absentee ballot in Alabama’s federal elections. Jurisdiction is proper under 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-4 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 2001.

This matter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Conroy v. AniskoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Cheffer v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Harrell v. the Florida BarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API