Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hyman v. Dillon

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 3, 1920Published

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Dade County, H. Pierre Branning, Judge.

1Concurrence

Browne, O. J.,

concurring. — I concur in the conclusion, that the judgment should be reversed and the prisoner discharged, but not entirely on the grounds upon which that conclusion is based.

*683The ordinance attacked provides in part: “No person, firm or corporation shall sell, or supply, or offer to sell or supply within the City of Miami, Florida, for a consideration, any water for human consumption, which shall have been taken from a well or other sources of supply within or without the limits of the City of Miami, unless the vendor shall hold a valid permit from the Board of Health of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hays v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
  2. State v. WuppermanTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Ballard v. RussellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API