Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 5, 2012No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]) and, in appeal No. 2, he appeals from the resentence imposed on that conviction. With respect to appeal No. 1, defendant contends that County Court erred in summarily denying his pro se motion to withdraw his plea. We reject that contention. A court need only afford a defendant a “reasonable opportunity to present his contentions” on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea (People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927 [1974]; see People v Buske, 87…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. TinsleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. D'ANTUONONew York Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. RossboroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. McNewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API