Legal Opinion
Saval v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2010No. 05-75622PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.
*668OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Vino Kumar Saval (“Saval”) and his wife Gita Kamala Nanikram (“Nanikram”) appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under Article III of the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss Saval’s petition as moot and we deny in part and dismiss in part Nanikram’s petition.
I
Saval and Nanikram, citizens and natives of India, entered the United States in July 1991 without inspection. In August 1991,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lucio Ricardo Alvarez-Santos, AKA Luciano Ricardo Alvarez AKA Lucio Ricardo Alvarez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Alexandru Gui v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Noel LOPEZ-REYES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Sahajeewa Rathnakumara Loku Kankanamge Don, Shiyamalie Amaratunga Achthi, Minul Thankula Kankanamge v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Saval v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010