Legal Opinion

Kohilakis v. Harwood

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Parley, J.

In this taxpayers’ action, defendants seek a dismissal of the complaint on the ground that no bond or surety was served with the summons and complaint as provided by section 51 of the General Municipal Law. The plaintiffs cross-move for permission to file a bond nunc pro tune and. also for a temporary injunction enjoining the expenditure of funds by defendants.

Summarizing the allegations of the complaint and what can be gathered from the affidavits, it appears that in March, 1959, the defendant Town Board adopted a resolution authorizing the acquisition of certain property, the erection…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bradford v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Bradford v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Eith v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hoey v. DaltonNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Vandervort v. City of TroyNew York Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vinnie Montes Waste System, Inc. v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API