Gridiron Mgmt. Group v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets GRIDIRON MGMT. GROUP v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. 901 Cite as
286 Neb. 901
CONCLUSION I disagree with the majority’s application of the “inexplica- bly intertwined” exception to the two October 2008 incidents which, I believe, fall under § 27-404(2). The court erred in admitting these incidents without a § 27-404(3) hearing. I conclude, however, that the error was harmless and therefore concur in the judgment. Stephan and Miller-Lerman, JJ., join in this concurrence. Stephan, J., concurring. To the extent that both of Smith’s statements to Corey in October 2008 can…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. SizemoreTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Salem Decorating Center, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. International Nutrition, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Hearst-Argyle v. Entrex Communication Svcs.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gibbons Ranches v. BaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Tran v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Winslow by and Through Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society - Superior v. State Ex Rel. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Freeman v. Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- Payne v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.