Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Barrows

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 1, 1976No. 168-75PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties in this case came to the lower court seeking a clarification and declaration of legal rights and relationships existing between them, a remedy authorized by law. See 12 V.S.A. § 4711. The purpose of a declaratory judgment is to enunciate, so far as is requested and appropriate, the rights of the parties. Graves v. Town of Waitsfield, 130 Vt. 292, 292 A.2d 247 (1972). Clarification was not forthcoming and the entitlement to declaration was not carried out. The matter must be reversed and remanded for a proper resolution of the issues because of errors in both the determination of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Graves v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Griffith v. NielsenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Bemis v. LambSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. Arapaho Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. AlpertSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. Arapaho Owners Association, Inc. and Kattalia v. AlpertSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API