Legal Opinion

Anglo-American Mill Co. v. Dingler

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided September 26, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, District Judge.

The ease is submitted for decree on a stipulation that the facts alleged in the petition and answer are true, and on an agreed statement of additional facts. An outline of. them, stated in order, is: On December 17, 1921, at Griffin, Ga., A. W. Edwards executed a written contract, termed a “license,” to use and buy certain patented flour mill machinery; title not to pass until payment in full in cash of stated sums. This was, by its terms, subject to acceptance by the licensor, Anglo-American Mill Company, at Owensboro, Ky. Such acceptance was had January 27, 1922. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Furst Bros. v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Smith v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  4. Rowe v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Berlin Mach. Works v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People's First Nat. Bank of Quitman v. Coe Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Plumb v. US. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API