Legal Opinion
In Re Stukes
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided December 5, 2006No. 06-00994-3P3PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case is before the Court upon Debt- or’s Objection to Claim Three (3) of ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc. After a hearing held on October 11, 2006, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On April 7, 2006, Veda Danita Stukes (“Debtor”) filed for Chapter 13 relief under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”).
2. Debtor listed ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc., (“ABN Amro”) on Schedule D of her bankruptcy petition as a secured creditor with a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Marion Seidler, Debtor. Thomas Russo, Dorothy Russo v. Marion SeidlerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Tepper v. Burnham (In Re Tepper)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Russell v. Transport Funding LLC (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- James Russell v. Transport FundingUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2008