Legal Opinion

Pennybaker v. Pennybaker

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 1985No. CA 84-372PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

Appellant appeals from a divorce decree because of his dissatisfaction with the chancellor’s division of the parties’ properties. Appellant’s sole contention is that the trial court erred in not complying with Ark. Stat; Ann. § 34-1214 (Supp. 1983), by failing to state in writing its basis and reasons for not returning appellant’s nonmarital property to him. However, his disagreement with the trial court’s decision extends to the court’s treatment of some of the parties’ marital property as well. Appellant claims that it did not divide the property equally and that it gave no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Carrick v. CarrickCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Cantrell v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kesterson v. KestersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Hale v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API