Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Brooke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 20, 1997, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the *911Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s conclusion that, during part of the period that claimant was collecting unemployment insurance benefits, he was not totally unemployed because he was president and 50% shareholder of an ongoing corporation. The business involved looking after the homes of vacationers and was created with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of De MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of KansuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re the Claim of VerdecchiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re the Claim of FrankeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re the Claim of WhitakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API