Legal Opinion

In Re Belluscio

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 23, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Cubiam.

Numerous instances of improper conduct by respondent in financial matters came to the attention of the Union County Ethics Committee through direct complaints of clients- and from other sources. Although the individual amounts involved were relatively small, a continual course of unethical and irresponsible activity prima facie appeared. On its own motion the Committee formulated the various matters into eight charges, which were served on respondent along with a notice of hearing. He filed no answer, but addressed a communication to this court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. In Re CarlsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. In Re GenserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. In Re HowellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. In Re BannerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BlasiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. In Re FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API