Legal Opinion

United States v. Mazza-Alaluf

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 29, 2009No. S1 07 Cr. 403 (PKC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PURSUANT TO RULE 23(c), FED R. CRIM. P.

P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge:

On October 15, 2008, the government filed a two-count superseding indictment against defendant Mauricio Mazza-Alaluf. The first count charged him under 18 U.S.C. § ■ 371 with conspiring to conduct an unlicensed money-transmitting business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1960, and the second count charged him with a substantive violation of section 1960. Mazza entered a plea of not guilty.

Defendant Mazza applied to the Court to waive his Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury. Rule…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Joseph Pitre Edwyn Pitre Angel M. Otero Richard PitreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Mazza-AlalufCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Nathel v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Nature v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
  4. Slemish Corp. S.A. v. MorgenthauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Slemish Corp. S.A. v. MorgenthauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API