State v. Miller

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Michael Miller ("Miller") brings this appeal challenging the trial court's judgment classifying him as a sexual predator. Specifically, Miller argues that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate classification hearing, the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is a sexual predator, and that his sexual predator classification violates due process and equal protection of the law. After a thorough review of the record and law, we affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural History

{¶ 2} The instant matter arose from an…