Legal Opinion

Ruhl v. James J. Corner & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 12, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. This is an action of assumpsit brought by the appellants against the appellee, James J. Corner, trading as James J. Corner & Co. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. First Exception.- — Sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. Second Exception. — All the testimony in the record is contained in the first exception.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. This is an action of assumpsit brought by the appellants against the appellee, James J. Corner, trading as James J. Corner & Co. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. First Exception.- — Sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. Second Exception. — All the testimony in the record is contained in the first exception. The second exception, without referring in express terms to the first, begins as follows: “ All the testimony being in, the plaintiffs offered the following prayers.” The prayers offered by the plaintiffs were the…

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

The appellee being a commission merchant in Baltimore, between the month of August, 1881, and the month of January, 1882, received consignments of flour from Oliver Merion, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, for sale upon commission. Upon the 21st of January, 1882, Merion shipped to Corner & Co., without order, a car-load of' “ Champion ” flour, being one hundred and twenty-five barrels, by Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad and Baltimore and Ohio Railroad via Chicago. On the same day he wrote Corner & Co. advising of this shipment, and naming a price at which Corner, his factor, should sell the same.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. . Hudson River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. FryerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. The Frances, Boyer, Master: Irvin’s ClaimSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  4. Hodges & Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Catanzara Di Giorgio Co. v. F. W. Stock & SonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Rowe v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. Bank of Litchfield v. ElliottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Dudley v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  5. Nisbet v. Siegel-Campion Live Stock Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API