Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rubenfeld
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed on the opinion of Mr. Justice James D. Hopkins at *937the Appellate Division with an addendum concerning the public policy of the State to which he adverts.
The public policy which it is asserted would be served were we to grant the relief sought by the dealer-tenant has subsequently been recognized and given effect in chapter 265 of the Laws of 1975. Whether that legislative enactment be interpreted as itself the genesis of the policy or perhaps more plausibly as the articulate recognition of a pre-existing policy, it is equally…
2Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Joseph M. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Robert ChestmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Rita C. O'neal, Cross-Appellant v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc., and General Foods Corporation, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.