Baas v. Society for Christian Instruction

On Application for Rehearing.

There is but 1 way to account politely for the mysterious refusal of any 1 of the reversers of this award to acknowledge, upon the record for all to see, the existence of Michigan’s “twofold purpose” rule.* It must be that Justices Kelly, Dethmers, Smith, and O’Hara “just haven’t the time” to defend or explain, precisely upon peremptory challenge, their joint and several omission of reference to or discussion of “twofold” cases like Anderson (Anderson v. Kroger Grocery Baking Company, 326 Mich 429) and Wheeler (Wheeler v. Department of Conservation, 350 Mich 590).…