Armour Pipe Line Co. v. Sandel Energy, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtKem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
In this oil and gas case we consider whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment and declaring that a purported exception and reservation in an assignment of oil, gas, and mineral leases is of no legal force or effect. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment and in making this declaration and that the trial court also erred in granting another summary-judgment motion that was based on the first summary judgment. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying a cross-motion for summary judgment to the extent the movants sought declaratory…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- M.D. Anderson Hospital & Tumor Institute v. WillrichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Armour Pipe Line Company, Mary Patricia Cashman, Joan Cashman, Noreen Cashman, Cathleen Cashman, and Caroline Dechant v. Sandel Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2022
- Gregory Schain v. JR Land Investments, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2026
- Marguerite Tamasy v. Lone Star College System, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
- Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc. v. West Texas LPG Pipeline L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- in the Estate of Jose Alfredo Mendoza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2020