Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Berg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 19, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition, to enforce a mechanic’s lien under Pub. Sts. c. 191. At the trial in the Superior Court, after the findings of the jury upon certain issues, Hopkins, J., found for the petitioner; and the respondent alleged exceptions. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is a petition to enforce a mechanic’s lien for labor and materials furnished in constructing a building under the following circumstances. The work was begun under a contract with the respondent dated July 18, 1898, and was completed on September 28,1898; when the contract of July 18 was made, the respondent was in possession of the land under a contract of purchase, and on August 30 became the owner thereof, under a deed dated June 8, 1898, made and delivered in pursuance of that contract; at that time the building was either plastered or half plastered.

*405The respondent testified that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Courtemanche v. Blackstone Valley Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rochford v. RochfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. McDowell v. RockwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Drazen Lumber Co. v. JenteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API