Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gowland v. State

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1998No. 98-C-1413Published

1Concurrence

| iMURRAY, Judge,

concurring with reasons.

Considering that the plaintiffs objected only to the State’s jury demand, rather than to the Amended Answer, I find the denial of leave to amend was an abuse of discretion under the factors set forth in Walker v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 95-1934 (La.App. 4th Cir.3/14/96), 671 So.2d 983. However, because the trial court is required to quantify the fault of all alleged tortfeasors in rendering judgment after trial, see La. Civ.Code Ann. art. 2323; La.Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art.1917, the State has not shown that it will be prejudiced by this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. Schwegmann Giant SupermarketsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API