Legal Opinion

Rauschkolb v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1896No. 7602PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court for Nemaha county. Tried below before Bush, J. See opinion for statement of the case. The court erred in refusing plaintiffs in error a reasonable time in which to prepare for trial after the name of the witness Levi Shores had been indorsed on the information. (Johnson v. Dinsmore, 11 Neb., 394; Newman v. State, 22 Neb., 355; Gandy v. State, 27 Neb., 707; People v. Evans, 72 Mich., 367; Elliott v. State, 34 Neb., 48.)

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This is a prosecution brought under section 20, chapter-50, Compiled Statutes of this state, for keeping and having in possession for sale, without a license, certain intoxicating liquors. The prisoners were found guilty, and the judgment rendered against them upon the verdict is before-us for review.

The record discloses that the case was continued from-term to term until the 20th day of March, 1894, when upon a showing made by the .county attorney, permission was given, over the objection of defendants, to indorse upon-the information the name of Levi Shores. An exception, to the ruling was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Parks v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Gandy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barney v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Steen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. State v. FulwiderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ossenkop v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hornberger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API