State v. Davis

(dissenting in part .and concurring in part).

I concur in the conclusion reached in the majority opinion that gambling as defined in Article 90 of the Louisiana Criminal Code is neither vague nor unconstitutional for the reasons urged in the several motions and pleas filed by the defendant, all ■of which have been previously adjudicated upon by this court in the .cases of State v. Pete, 206 La, 1078, 20 So.2d 368, and State v. Varnado, La.Sup., 23 So.2d 106, 123, both of which decisions I had the privilege of writing, but I cannot subscribe to the conclusion reached in the majority opinion…