Legal Opinion

Stutts v. Stutts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 6, 1982No. 81-20PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari was granted because of an alleged conflict between this case and Monroe v. Monroe, 356 So.2d 196 (Ala.Civ.App.1977). We agree that a conflict does exist between Monroe and the present case, as well as other cases. However, it is our opinion that the case of McGugin v. McGugin, 357 So.2d 347 (Ala.Civ.App.1978), contains the correct reasoning, and to the extent Monroe is in conflict with McGugin and the other cases consistent therewith, it should not be followed.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, 418 So.2d 113, is therefore affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGugin v. McGuginCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Monroe v. MonroeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holman v. HolmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  2. Howell v. HowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API