Legal Opinion

Logan v. County Court

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, Barton County Circuit Court. cited: United States vs. Wiley, 11 Wall. 513, 514 ; Richardson, Adm’r, vs. Harrison, Adm’r, 36 Mo. 100 ; McKinzie’s Adm’r vs. Hill’s Adm’r, 51 Mo. 307, 308 ; Mclvor vs. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 29 ; Wagn.

Read the full summary

Appeal from, Barton County Circuit Court. cited: United States vs. Wiley, 11 Wall. 513, 514 ; Richardson, Adm’r, vs. Harrison, Adm’r, 36 Mo. 100 ; McKinzie’s Adm’r vs. Hill’s Adm’r, 51 Mo. 307, 308 ; Mclvor vs. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 29 ; Wagn. Stat. ch. 40, §§ 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ; Bauer vs. Franklin Co., 51 Mo. 208 ; Coy vs. City Council of Lyons City, 17 la. 1-8. cited : Richardson, Adm’r, vs. Harrison, Adm’r, 36 Mo. 96; Hall vs. Wyburn 2 Salic. 420 ; President and Directors of Bank of Alabama vs. Dalton, 9 How. 522 ; Mclvor vs. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25 ; McKinzie’s Adm’r vs.…

1Opinion of the CourtNapton, Judge

This was a petition by the treasurer of Barton county .or a mandamus upon the justices of the county court, to allow certain warrants received by him in his settlement with the county court, as treasurer. The court had refused to credit him with these warrants, because they were barred by the statute of limitations before they were paid to the collector or received by the treasurer.

The treasurer filed an answer, which, among other defenses to the statute of limitations, alleged as follows : “The relator further answering said return, says, that during the years 1859, 1860 and 1861 the county…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Knox CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Reynolds v. NormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. United States ex rel. Harshman v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API