Legal Opinion

In re the Construction of the Will of Hinman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 21, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maximilian Moss, S.

This is an application for a construction of the will of testatrix with respect to the intended disposition of certain real property. Testatrix’ holographic will dated October 28,1931, was admitted to probate on September 25,1956. In paragraph 1 ‘ Third ’ ’ of the will, testatrix provided in part as follows: “ I give to Mildred Hinman (her daughter) In trust for Theadore Junghans her god child and my grand son my home with all furnishings * * #. I positively wish no encumbrance such as a mortgage or lean [sic] to be placed upon this property * * *. This home is not to be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. In re the Accounting of KroossNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Crooke v. . County of KingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Stringer v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Rose v. . HatchNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BaranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. BaranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. In re the Estate of BoltonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API