Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sheriff v. Bessey

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1996No. 26362Published

1Dissent

Rose, J., with whom Young, J., joins,

dissenting:

I dissent because the majority is providing police and prosecutors with an investigatory weapon which they have little if any need for, but which has great potential for intentional abuse and inadvertent harm and havoc.

This case sets the limits to which law enforcement can go in using deception or falsehoods to secure a confession from a *329defendant. Unfortunately, the majority sets no limits at all-permitting the police to use all manner of falsehoods and deception in attempting to secure a confession. Understanding that law enforcement needs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. ChippasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. People v. StadnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. State v. CaywardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API