Hutchinson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentDavidson, J.
In my view, a judgment pending on appeal is not sufficently probative to establish that a probationer committed the crime of which he was convicted and, therefore, is not admissible to show that the probationer *372violated the special condition of his probation that he obey all laws. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
In Maryland, it has been recognized that for certain purposes a judgment pending on appeal is not final until after the appeal has been decided. Maryland State Bar Ass’n v. Kerr, 272 Md. 687, 689, 326 A.2d 180, 181 (1974); Green v. State, 170 Md. 134, 142, 183 A. 526, 530 (1936);…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Arbuckle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- United States v. Allen, John BrettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.