Legal Opinion

Bullard v. Universal Millwork Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 10, 1960No. Civ. No. 20086PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The plaintiff herein moves, pursuant to Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for an order directing the defendant, by its president, to appear for the taking of his deposition upon oral examination, and for an order, pursuant to Rule 37(d) striking defendant’s answer if he should fail to appear.

This action was commenced by the filing of the complaint in the Office of the Clerk of this Court on September 2,1959. It was served on the defendant on October 5, 1959. On September 23, 1959 the plaintiff served on the defendant, by mail, a notice to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Verticals, Inc. v. Louverdrape, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API