Legal Opinion

Blanco v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 16, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-1883Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID A. BLANCO, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-1883 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 11, 13 : CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS- MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David A Blanco (“Plaintiff” or “Blanco”) brings the instant action against Christine E. Wormuth in her official capacity as the United States Secretary of the Army, 1 claiming that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (the “ABCMR”) violated…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Compton James Richards v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API