Legal Opinion
Laurie Hobson v. Wells Fargo Bank N A
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2014No. 12-35198UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Laurie Hobson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her action arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Kaplan v. City of N. Las Vegas, 323 F.3d 1226, 1229 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment in Hobson’s quiet title action because Hobson failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the loan had been repaid. See Trusty v. Ray, 73 Idaho 232, 236, 249 P.2d 814 (1952) (“A mortgagor cannot without paying his debt quiet title as against the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Frederick Kaplan v. City of North Las Vegas Thomas H. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Spencer v. JamesonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Trusty v. RayIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Edwards v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dalby v. Ditech Financial LLCDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019