State Ex Rel. Tilkens v. Board of Trustees of Firemen's Pension Fund
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The decision in this case depends on the construction to be given sec. 62.13 (10) (e), Stats., particularly with .reference to the phrase therein reading “sustain injury while not on duty.”
In determining the meaning of any single phrase of a statute it is necessary to look at it in the light of the whole of the statute. • Sec. 62.13 (10) (e), Stats.,'provides that a member of the fire department shall be entitled to a pension, (1) if he “while engaged in the performance of duty ... be injured, or contract a disease due to his occupation,” or (2) if he “sustain injury while not on duty.” If,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State ex rel. McManus v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Polzin v. WachtlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by12 opinions
- County of Milwaukee v. ProeglerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Marriage of Arneson v. ArnesonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Northwest General Hospital v. YeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Plachta v. PlachtaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.