Legal Opinion

Douglas-Seibert v. Riccucci

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 9, 2012No. 5D10-3562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

In this rear-end auto collision case, Dianna Douglas-Seibert appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury returned a verdict in favor of rear-vehicle defendants Louis Riccucci and Tarmac America, LLC. The trial court erred in denying Douglas-Seibert’s motion for a directed verdict and, therefore, we reverse the judgment.

Douglas-Seibert alleged negligence on the part of Riccucci and Tarmac, the driver and owner of a cement truck that rear-ended her vehicle. At trial, after the close of evidence, Douglas-Seibert moved for a directed verdict on the issue of Riccucci’s negligence,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clampitt v. DJ Spencer SalesSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Tozier v. JarvisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Pierce v. Progressive American Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Lynch v. TennysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Tenny v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Volusia County v. JoyntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Huddleston v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
  3. Jones v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API