Legal Opinion

Entin v. Entin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated September 16, 1992, as directed him to pay from marital funds and assets the reasonable collegiate expenses of the parties’ two sons.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant has failed to provide any evidence to demonstrate that the pendente lite award constituted an improper exercise of discretion (see, Filosa v Raven-Filosa, 185 AD2d 225; Guiry v Guiry, 159 AD2d 556).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guiry v. GuiryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Erdheim v. ErdheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Filosa v. Raven-FilosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pascals v. PascalsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Martin v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API