Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Rounsavelle

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1936No. Civ. No. 10997Published

1Opinion of the Court

15 Cal.App.2d 751 (1936)

THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Petitioner,

v.

GERTRUDE H. ROUNSAVELLE et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 10997.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

August 5, 1936.

Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Leon Thomas David, Assistant City Attorney, and Arthur Loveland, Deputy City Attorney, for Petitioner.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, and J. H. O'Connor, Assistant County Counsel, for Respondents.

McComb, J., pro tem.

This is an original proceeding for a writ of mandate to compel the officers of the board of education of the city of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. State Ex Rel. GribbenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State ex rel. McDonald v. NemachekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API