Legal Opinion

Town of Hardinsburg v. Cravens

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1897No. 18,126PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellee sued the appellants to enjoin them from taking down certain gates across an alleged highway passing over and through appellee’s land. The trial court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, assigning insufficiency of facts stated therein to constitute a cause of action. The defendants refusing to plead further, the plaintiff took judgment upon demurrer. The errors assigned only call in question that ruling and the sufficiency of the facts. The substance of the complaint is that in the year 1871, and a long time previous thereto, James A. Cravens owned a large tract of land which…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Anderson v. Santa AnnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Byrum v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McKee v. Town of PendletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Souers v. WalterIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Furness v. BrummittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Pass v. State Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API