Legal Opinion · Dissent

Comden v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1978No. L.A. 30787Published

1DissentManuel, J.

I respectfully dissent from the views presented by the majority. My reason for doing so is my belief that the trial court acted arbitrarily in applying a literal application of rule 2-111 (A)(4) without balancing the equities involved. In so doing, the trial court appears to have been merely enforcing a rule of professional conduct, a function better left to the State Bar, rather than determining if there existed any real impropriety threatening the integrity of the proceeding before it.

It is commonplace for attorneys to participate in the business-legal aifairs of their clients, and this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,328 J. P. Foley & Co., Inc. v. Oliver D. Vanderbilt, Arthur Young & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cooper v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API