Legal Opinion

Lander v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1959No. 3676PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

Appellee grounded its cause of action on a contract of suretyship evidenced by a contract between appellee and appellant whereby appellee bound itself to be surety on appellant’s bond for certain construction work to be done in Louisiana and known as contract No. 4619. The controlling factual situation does not yield to a simple statement. At the conclusion of the evidence appellee presented its motion for instructed verdict, which was overruled; thereafter the Court submitted two issues to the jury:

“(1) Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  5. Guarantee Co. of North America v. PittsMississippi Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glenn H. Engbrock, Glenn H. Engbrock, Inc. And Encon Construction, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Ford v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API